|
AN UNUSUAL GRADUATION CEREMONY
Graduation
ceremonies in Britain are generally sombre and stately
occasions; I knew this one was going to be different when I
got the invite: a professionally printed, folded, card
containing lots of information and with a logo on the front.
The invitation came from Holland and this is how they do
things at the Technicological University of Delft , or at
least, in the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering. Forget
anything you have seen before - this has to be unique!
For one thing
, instead of the scores of capped and gowned students waiting
for the ten second ceremony of degree conferring , as in this
country, a lone student is in the spotlight. There is no top
table of dignatories to bestow largesse. Instead, it is the
Faculty Professor who initially holds the stage with a few
words in Dutch (naturally) and in English, in case there were
any English speaking people present. His words explain the
forthcoming procedure and welcome the audience of friends,
relatives and colleagues. It is now about 10.00 am.
A hall in the
university is chosen for the occasion capable of seating some
hundred or more. The first thing that catches your eye is the
large screen at the end of the room illuminated by a
spotlight. Round the walls are drawings and collages done by
the student during the final project. But pride of place goes
to a display of figures or models representing the five
disciplines of the Faculty. Consequently, everything is an
integral part of the final assessment.
Although the
student is to a large extent “on trial” as it were, the
atmosphere is relaxed , almost festive, but a serious intent
is evident. It is a curious mixture of anticipation and
resignation , the student having come so far knows he/she is
sure to pass , but with what grade? It must be quite an
experience for the graduand either way , as it is a long day
to be on show, knowing that your performance is, like your
work, being adjudged. For this is what it is : a performance
consisting mainly of a display of slides illustrating the work
, with spoken commentary, lasting about an hour. This phase of
the exposition is known as the “colloquium” because time is
given for questions from the audience , which you will
remember consists of academics as well as friends.
But this is
only part of it : the public part. There is yet to come the
“Viva” : the oral examining by University staff, held. as it
were in camera., This lasts another hour or so while the
guests regale themselves with conversation , walking about,
eating cake, and drinking coffee. Evaluating questions are
asked of the candidate (female on this occasion) who exchanges
views with her tutors. Some two weeks before the presentation
candidates have to deliver a written paper of about eighty A4
pages with photographs and drawings , explaining all the
processes involved ; the research, the design, the decisions
made. So besides the presentation and the models this paper
can be discussed in the oral where candidates have to defend
what they have written. It is certainly a long time to be
cross-examined , unless it is more of dialogue or symposium.
Whatever be its nature , at about 12.30. pm. the culmination
of some five or six years of study is reached. The assessment
of the candidate is made and a final mark out of ten is
awarded.
With great
anticipation we all resume our seats. The student stands to
one side as the professor assumes again centre stage to make a
few remarks , and some witticisms which were double Dutch to
me….I presume some allusion was made to the grade awarded and
then came the big moment: the handing over of the diploma to
the worthy student (whom I should now refer to as graduate)
before the assembly - the latest M.Sc. in Industrial Design
Technology of Delft University.
It seems the
custom is for much rejoicing afterwards. Guests queue up to
congratulate the recipient and much champagne is imbibed.
Presented flowers are collected along with the collages and
proudly borne away. The five models made by the student are
retained by the Faculty for the edification of future
students. A nice gesture by the University and a fitting end
to all the years of hard work by the student.
There is no
Bachelor Degree awarded – in this particular Faculty at least.
A first degree is called an M.Sc. (not unknown in Britain).
However the basic course is longer than most in this country,
(i.e. UK) being commonly five or six years.
The Dutch
degree ceremony (or this Faculty`s) is clearly very time
consuming. Half a day for one student! How do they do it?
By the expedient of holding degree ceremonies throughout the
year. It seems that written exams are held five times a year
, so it follows that the final exam – the exposition – is five
times a year also. If a score of potential graduates is to be
assessed it will necessitate a score of days , spread over the
year. I am unclear how far students are accommodated in this
process: how much their preferences for dates are taken into
account. Each student has different ideas how best to present
the final project. Some have slides, spot lights, music,
recordings – and some do not. The “Presentation” is entirely
up to the individual. There is a desire to be different, if
at all possible. Among other things , of great importance, is
the stance of the protagonist, the graduate herself/himself ,
namely the person`s physical location .
At the
“Display System” (as it is called) which I saw , the student
was to one side standing in what I could best describe as a
Punch and Judy box, so that only the head and shoulders were
visible to the audience. A spot light illuminated but did not
dazzle the speaker. As the occasion demanded , she (the
student) stepped out from behind the box to draw attention to
something of particular significance with a pointer. The voice
was at all times clearly audible.
Apparently,
this device was an innovation (among the Presentations) . This
particular student had wished to do something unusual, and in
this she succeeded whereby the slides and models were at all
times clearly visible , the person was unobtrusive (but
likewise visible) and the commentary and highlighting
coherent. In addition of course the set-up had the charm of
novelty.
Hence the logo
on the invitation : “I O in de kast”, which for those with
little Dutch means a (presentation) of “Industrial Design (Ontwerpen)
in the cupboard (kast).
Every year
students have to do about fifteen subjects (theoretical and
practical). Either they are exams (five times a year) or
design exercises where models and papers are assessed. To
continue the next year they have to gain a certain percentage
in those subjects. Then once all the compulsory subjects are
finished together with the chosen graded ones they are allowed
to start their final project. They then look for staff members
as mentors and a subject of their own interest. Then they
start and each month they meet and discuss progress. At the
beginning of the project students have to make a timetable
with approximately the date they want to finish it. They are
allowed to change this date if they and their professor think
they need more time to achieve a good result. Then six weeks
before the “big day” , the team meets for the last time and
the decision is made as to whether the student is ready.
Having received the green light the student finishes the
prototype or model and the paper which has to be delivered to
the team. The student then prepares the presentation . The
mark he or she gets for this project is the graduation mark
and if all the grades of years before are over a certain
average , students can pass cum laude.
It was an
enjoyable occasion . Thanks must go to the support of fellow
students, past and present, the Faculty for having such a
unique system and not least the graduand for her imaginative
and confident approach to the event.
Finally a word
about the five designs or “models” made by the student.
Each model
(about 18” high) is chosen to represent the five main themes
or disciplines of the Faculty , as the student interprets
them. (It must be stressed that not all graduates of the
Faculty have the same approach to the final day`s display. It
so happens that the ceremony I witnessed was particularly
instructive with regard to the themes of study because of the
nature of the artefacts. .
One model was
akin to a tower made (or coated) with velvet, consisting of
several opening doors . This was interpreted – explained as
the theme of ERGONOMICS: the science of products (or
production) in relation to humanity (or the human race).
Another model
was a representation of a metal stand – a box-like shape, with
what could be described as pendulum-like objects ,
watch-chains so to speak, hanging from it as if from the
cross-bar of a pair of goal posts. This represented the theme
of CONSTRUCTION and the importance of the science of
mechanics thereto.
Another was
the figure of a human female representing a fertility
goddess; the torso at least. Colour, shape. form, and size
were all very important here. This represented the theme of
AESTHETICS, and its primacy in modern thought.
A fourth was
in the shape of a hot air balloon ; burgeoning from below,
illustrating the concept of the principle “from small
acorns….” This represented the theme of ECONOMICS or
marketing and so laid stress on knowing the market, the
firm`s targets , and its products.
The fifth was a factory ,
illustrating the industrial and industrious aspects of
design at the Faculty in general. Television screens and
interactive computer devices give more information about the
Faculty and their programmes. The wheels illustrate the design
process as students are taught in Delft.
© A.B. Finlay Ph.D
|