|
A CASE FOR A CORONER
The body was found
beneath the window of his 10th floor apartment in
Moscow.
The British Embassy`s
comment was that Appleton was well known as a drinker and had
long had suicidal tendencies. It was not surprised at the
tragedy.
Looking down into the
street a few days earlier Tom Appleton had noticed a man whom
he had seen several times before, trying to look
inconspicuous. He walked round the block and disappeared, but
always at different times.
Obviously casing the
joint, thought Tom.
That night Tom wrote a
note to a neighbour who although not by any means as “active”
as he, could be trusted with a message which he would
endeavour to deliver to the right quarter.
“…..looks very much as
if I am under surveillance. In fact ,I fear I may be
arrested. As it would not be wise at the moment to pursue my
extra-curricular activities, should we call them, I am just
performing my wonted duties at the Bank. Can you convey my
fears to you know whom….”
Tom Appleton had in fact
been an employee of a well-known bank all his adult life,
working his way diligently and unobtrusively up the company
ladder. When he was appointed a bank representative in
Moscow, espionage was the last thing on his mind. Security
authorities were always on the look-out for likely lads (and
lasses) and an innocuous bank representative , especially in
Moscow, appeared tailor-made. Tom was recruited to the
espionage team by appealing to his strong sense of patriotism
mainly, but sweetened by the promise of backhanders for his
pains and the attendant dangers.
Tom was about 45 when
recruited, a well-built man of average height , gregarious,
and knowing enough Russian to get by. Although somewhat rusty
now he had been quite fluent at university where he had
studied the language. He expected to soon pick it up again in
his new post.
“Of course, it means
you`ll have to establish contact with the KGB as soon as
possible without raising suspicion,” his contact said
abruptly. “I suggest the best way to do this is to go to KGB
headquarters in the city and make out you`d be willing to do a
little work for them in return for a consideration.
Ostensibly this would be on ideological grounds.”
Tom`s mission was to
arrange a supply of black-listed technology from the West to
the Russian authorities and in return to pass back information
to his MI5 controller. It was a dangerous game but Tom felt he
was influencing the course of history. The technology was
vetted for suitability i.e. that of dubious value – which the
recipients were not to know. In contrast, Tom was to supply
only information of real consequence. On the surface he was
a model and industrious bank employee. In the evenings and on
his days off he was something else. This lasted during the
late 80s , early 90s – until the KGB found him out.
The knock on the door
had not that evening been entirely unexpected. Four men had
rushed in and without saying a word had set into Tom leaving
him semi-conscious. His bruises were not to be distinguished
from those to be expected in a fall from a 10th
floor window, his attackers reasoned.
Nobody witnessed the
attack , the fall or could shed light on the attackers, (if
any) . Officially, Tom Appleton had fallen to his death in a
drunken, suicidal state. His cry for help had gone unheard or
unheeded and instead of being helped to pull out he had been
left to fend for himself , in vain.
As the circumstances
were unusual to say the least and needed investigation , a
post mortem was performed on the body. Forensic tests revealed
no trace of alcohol in the body! Any coroner worth his salt
would have his suspicions raised about the official line and I
was no exception. I immediately pressed for more information
before the public inquest opened. It was clear that some
sort of cover-up was in place, because I was getting nowhere
fast with my inquiries. The only “advice” I received came in
the form of a brief phone call from the Foreign Office: “It
would be better all round if a verdict achieved expeditiously
of accidental death or misadventure was recorded” an anonymous
voice said, identifying itself only by status not name. I had
no time to argue before the caller hung up. I had been given
the message and it was expected that, reading between the
lines, I would obey.
In the meantime, I did
some research into Appleton. It seems he was much more of a
complex character than the media line purported. Of course I
had never , at least since the forensic tests were done ,
doubted that he was not just an ordinary bank employee.
Appleton had never married but this did not mean he hadn`t an
eye for the opposite sex. In fact quite the reverse: he had
several Russian women “friends” although one appeared to be
particularly close, who by all accounts, had been planted by
the KGB, and whose true role, to winkle out information where
she could , was unsuspected by Appleton. Despite the seeming
danger to British security in this liaison , he managed to
carry on his spying activities to the evident satisfaction of
his bosses back in England. He was clearly very discreet. It
is possible that this side of his life he kept hidden from
MI5. This “affair” shall we call it , was however not one of
the inducements that helped persuade Appleton to enter the
world of espionage. Rather he became an apparent double agent
mainly because it was the basis on which he had been
approached in the first place. That he had maintained his
integrity to his homeland despite his love affair did him
great credit I believed. I was all the more determined to see
justice done the more I learned of him.
The difficulty was that
witnesses could hide behind the Official Secrets Act if the
inquest were to be held in public, as was customary. The only
way to get at the truth of the incident was to hold the
inquest in secret. It was my court and I had jurisdiction over
procedures therein. I ordered the matter to be held in secret.
I hated the idea of a cover-up and I was determined to expose
it. I was however taken aback by the reaction of some of the
newspapers , one in particular which is well known for its
supportive government tone.
Under the heading ,
“Coroner orders Inquest in Secret” with the sub-heading ,
“Official Secrets Act to be Defied”, my name and court were
made public and shown in an adverse light. In the column that
followed, the argument advanced by the paper was that hearings
should only be held in secret when national security was
involved – which I believed it was. The Foreign Office was of
course denying this was the case. Ostensibly I was in the
wrong. The newspaper felt so strongly about this that it took
legal action against me.
The upshot was that in
the High Court my decision was reversed and I came in for
some criticism from the Judge , Lord Justice “S”…….(now
retired I understand ) who referred to me as “A very stubborn
man ….misguided in his belief ……” This judgement left me
feeling very angry and dismayed as I left the courthouse that
morning. My resolve to see justice done was nevertheless as
strong as ever. The inquest had still to be held , albeit now
in public, but still in my court……(S.E. England). I prepared
the case thoroughly and researched the background material
meticulously. I was determined to prove my point against all
odds though I could not now summon vital witnesses as they
could claim immunity.
The jury had to be
convinced that Appleton had been unlawfully killed despite all
publicity to the contrary. “How can a man who tests revealed
had no alcohol in his body have fallen off his balcony in a
drunken stupor?” I argued. “Moreover Appleton had not
displayed any suicidal tendencies to those who knew him. He
was successful in his career , outward going, happy in his
personal relationships …..and in the valuable work he was
doing for his country.” I could see the jury`s eyes widen as
I revealed the story of the dead man`s secret life. Naturally
they knew nothing of this when they filed in . Of course the
powers-that-be wanted none of this detail to come out but my
one consuming mission was that the truth had to be told about
this man; I had no thought of any repercussions. Justice had
to be done at any price.
My master stroke was the
note , which Tom Appleton had written to his neighbour a few
days before he had died. This I had made it my business to
secure. I made great play of this note drawing it forcibly to
the jury`s attention. It was appreciated for what it truly
was: a cri de coeur from a patriot who felt the net closing
in. The fact that no help was extended to a man who had
been placed in his perilous position by people who did not
want to know, weighed heavily in my favour.
“Far from being a
suicidal drunk , Appleton had died in the service of his
country,” were my last words of address to the jury.
I awaited the verdict in
the crowded courtroom. Nervously I doodled on my notepad. I
could not bear to think of my case being rejected by the jury
and the consequent damage it would do to my reputation and
career. The jury returned and the spokeswoman was ready to
give the verdict.
“We find that Mr
Appleton had been unlawfully killed.”
My struggles against
authority and the process of a so-called law that made
cover-ups possible had been vindicated , at least in my court.
Perhaps others would now take up the fight for justice in the
teeth of establishment odds. I was part of this establishment
it was true, but I drew the line at besmirching a man foe the
sake of a dishonest national reputation. Tom Appleton was an
honourable man who had died a lonely and horrible death for
his beliefs. At least his reputation was now secure. ,
“Thanks to your efforts” said well-wishers . It was the best
moment of my life. I could not top it. The following year I
took early retirement.
(I am now able to tell
the story. The protagonist's name has been changed.)
© A.B. Finlay Ph.D
|